Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers
Placeholder for model effectiveness
Placeholder for manuscripts count 1
Placeholder for manuscripts count 2
Placeholder for results from well-defined research
Skip-to content here...
Description field here
Related models list
Where to find out more - can be model view mode
Here is the raw field value
39Here is the rendered field
Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.
Meets HHS Criteria
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2011
Effectiveness
Evidence of model effectiveness
Title | General population | Tribal population | Domains with favorable effects |
---|---|---|---|
Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers | Meets HHS criteria for an early childhood home visiting service delivery model | Does not meet HHS criteria for tribal population because the model has not been evaluated with a tribal population. |
|
Model description
The Early Intervention Program (EIP) for Adolescent Mothers was designed to help young mothers gain social competence and achieve model objectives by teaching self-management skills, techniques for coping with stress and depression, and skills to communicate effectively with partners, family, peers, and social agencies. The model served pregnant Latina and African American adolescents who were referred to the county health department or another health services agency for nursing care. EIP included 17 home visits from mid-pregnancy through the child’s first year of life. During home visits, public health nurses used a variety of teaching methods to cover five main content areas: (1) health, (2) sexuality and family planning, (3) maternal role, (4) life skills, and (5) social support systems.
Extent of evidence
For more information, see the research database. For more information on the criteria used to rate research, please see details of HomVEE’s methods and standards.
Summary of findings
To see details on each manuscript HomVEE reviewed in well-designed research, click on the manuscript counts in the table.
Favorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that is beneficial for children and parents.
No effect:
Findings are not statistically significant.
Unfavorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that may indicate potential harm to children and/or parents.
Outcomes | Manuscripts | Favorable Findings | No Effects Findings | Unfavorable Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Child development and school readiness | Not measured | - | - | - |
Child health | View 3 Manuscripts | 8 | 10 | 0 |
Family economic self-sufficiency | View 1 Manuscript | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Linkages and referrals | Not measured | - | - | - |
Maternal health | View 4 Manuscripts | 0 | 19 | 1 |
Positive parenting practices | View 3 Manuscripts | 0 | 9 | 0 |
Reductions in child maltreatment | Not measured | - | - | - |
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime | Not measured | - | - | - |
Implementation
Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.
Model implementation profile last updated: 2019
Theoretical approach
The Early Intervention Program (EIP) for Adolescent Mothers was designed to help young mothers gain social competence and achieve model objectives by teaching self-management skills, techniques for coping with stress and depression, and skills to communicate effectively with partners, family, peers, and social agencies.Implementation support availability
EIP was developed by researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Nursing. The model developer and director provided implementation support. EIP was initially implemented as a collaborative demonstration project between the developer and the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health, Division of Community Health Services.
No information was available about technical assistance.
Intended population
EIP served pregnant adolescents from underserved minority groups who were referred to the county health department or another health services agency for nursing care. Women were eligible for EIP if they were 14 to 19 years old; at 26 weeks gestation or less; pregnant with their first child; and planning to keep the infant. Expectant mothers who were chemically dependent or had serious medical or obstetric problems were ineligible. Although EIP initially targeted adolescents, young mothers out of adolescence also may have benefited from the model.Targeted outcomes
EIP was designed to improve maternal health behaviors during and after pregnancy; improve birth outcomes and mother and infant health; build maternal caretaking skills and improve the quality of mother-child interaction; prevent rapid repeat pregnancy; increase educational achievement; and build social competence.Model services
Nurse home visitors delivered EIP services using a case management approach. During home visits, nurse home visitors covered five main content areas: (1) health, (2) sexuality and family planning, (3) maternal role, (4) life skills, and (5) social support.
Prenatal visits focused on the use of prenatal health care, preparation for childbirth, and self-care during pregnancy. In addition, nurse home visitors conducted four classes focusing on the transition to motherhood, fetal development, parent-child communication, and maternal health.
During the postpartum visits, nurse home visitors provided mothers with information on family planning; infant care and development; well-baby health care; education attainment; substance use; mental health issues, such as handling emotions; and referrals for mental health counseling, family planning, and child care. For example, EIP addressed the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (such as HIV/AIDs), contraceptive options, school readiness preparations (such as reading to children), and prevention of lead poisoning. Nurse home visitors also helped mothers improve communication skills and learn how to assess their infants’ needs, respond to infant distress, and interact reciprocally with their infants. To help mothers improve their infant interaction and nurturing skills, nurse home visitors used videotherapy, in which they videotaped a mother interacting with her infant and subsequently solicited the mother’s opinion about the quality of the interaction.
Nurse home visitors implemented all aspects of the model using standardized protocols to ensure uniformity. The EIP protocols were organized based on the nursing process and covered each of five content areas. Examples of worksheets used to facilitate learning and behavior change included “Psychological Aspects of Appetite and Food,” “Danger Signals During Pregnancy,” “Prenatal Rest, Exercise, and Activity,” and “I Want to Change.” Another worksheet (called “What Do I Do?”) was used when the mother needed help solving a problem. Protocols incorporated several teaching techniques, such as examining educational and vocational goals and options, completing problem-solving worksheets, and letter writing.
Model intensity and length
EIP included home visits from mid-pregnancy through the end of the child’s first year. The model included 17 home visits—2 prenatal and 15 postpartum—each lasted 1.5 to 2.0 hours. Postnatal visits occurred when the child was one, four, and six weeks old and at monthly intervals between the child’s 2nd and 12th months. In addition, EIP offered four “preparation for motherhood” classes.Adaptations and enhancements
No information was available about model adaptations or enhancements.
Organizational requirements
EIP was originally implemented collaboratively by the UCLA School of Nursing and the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health, Division of Community Health Services. The model could have been administered by other health service agencies.
No information was available about the fidelity guidelines that implementing programs or nurse home visitors were required to meet.
Staffing requirements
Public health nurses from local health departments or nurses from other health service agencies conducted home visits and classes. A supervisor guided and monitored their implementation. In the initial demonstration of EIP, nurse home visitors were employed by the county health department and contracted by the university to deliver EIP services, and the model also employed recruiters.
No information was available on the staff education and experience requirements. In the initial demonstration of EIP, nurse home visitors had, on average, five years of experience with the county health department, a bachelor’s degree in nursing, and a public health nursing certificate from the state of California.
No information was available on supervision requirements.
This model required that the nurse home visitors participate in pre-service training. EIP required on-site staff training from the model developer and director. For the demonstration, pre-service training for nurse home visitors was approximately 60 hours.
No information was available on ongoing professional development requirements.
Where to find out more
Deborah Koniak-Griffin, EdD, RNC, FAAN
University of California at Los Angeles, School of Nursing
Box 956919
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Phone: (310) 206-3842
Email:dkoniak@sonnet.ucla.edu
Inese Verzemnieks, PhD, RN
University of California at Los Angeles, School of Nursing
5-637 Factor Building
700 Tiverton Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90095-6919
Phone: (310) 206-9165
Email: iverzemn@sonnet.ucla.edu
HomVEE requests input and feedback from the model developers on their profiles. The information in this implementation profile reflects feedback, if provided, from this model’s developer as of the above date. HomVEE reserves the right to edit the profile for clarity and consistency. The description of the implementation of the model(s) here may differ from how the model(s) was implemented in the manuscripts reviewed to determine this model’s evidence of effectiveness. Model developers are encouraged to notify HomVEE of any changes to their contact information on this page.